A polypill strategy to improve adherence results from the FOCUS project

Jose M. Castellano, Gines Sanz, Jose L. Penalvo, Sameer Bansilal, Antonio Fernandez-Ortiz, Luz Alvarez, Luis Guzman, Juan Carlos Linares, Fernando Garcia, Fabiana D'Aniello, Joan Albert Arnaiz, Sara Varea, Felipe Martinez, Alberto Lorenzatti, Inaki Imaz, Luis M. Sanchez-Gomez, Maria Carla Roncaglioni, Marta Baviera, Sidney C. Smith, Kathryn TaubertStuart Pocock, Carlos Brotons, Michael E. Farkouh, Valentin Fuster

Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-article

Abstract

BACKGROUND Adherence to evidence-based cardiovascular (CV) medications after an acute myocardial infarction (MI) is low after the first 6 months. The use of fixed-dose combinations (FDC) has been shown to improve treatment adherence and risk factor control. However, no previous randomized trial has analyzed the impact of a polypill strategy on adherence in post-MI patients.

OBJECTIVES The cross-sectional FOCUS (Fixed-Dose Combination Drug for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention) study (Phase 1) aimed to elucidate factors that interfere with appropriate adherence to CV medications for secondary prevention after an acute MI. Additionally, 695 patients from Phase 1 were randomized into a controlled trial (Phase 2) to test the effect of a polypill (containing aspirin 100 mg, simvastatin 40 mg, and ramipril 2.5, 5, or 10 mg) compared with the 3 drugs given separately on adherence, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, as well as safety and tolerability over a period of 9 months of follow-up.

METHODS In Phase 1, a 5-country cohort of 2,118 patients was analyzed. Patients were randomized to either the polypill or 3 drugs separately for Phase 2. Primary endpoint was adherence to the treatment measured at the final visit by the self-reported Morisky-Green questionnaire (MAQ) and pill count (patients had to meet both criteria for adherence at the in-person visit to be considered adherent).

RESULTS In Phase 1, overall CV medication adherence, defined as an MAQ score of 20, was 45.5%. In a multivariable regression model, the risk of being nonadherent (MAQ <20) was associated with younger age, depression, being on a complex medication regimen, poorer health insurance coverage, and a lower level of social support, with consistent findings across countries.

In Phase 2, the polypill group showed improved adherence compared with the group receiving separate medications after 9 months of follow-up: 50.8% versus 41% (p = 0.019; intention-to-treat population) and 65.7% versus 55.7% (p = 0.012; per protocol population) when using the primary endpoint, attending the final visit with MAQ = 20 and high pill count (80% to 110%) combined, to assess adherence. Adherence also was higher in the FDC group when measured by MAQ alone (68% vs. 59%, p = 0.049). No treatment difference was found at follow-up in mean systolic blood pressure (129.6 mm Hg vs. 128.6 mm Hg), mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (89.9 mg/dl vs. 91.7 mg/dl), serious adverse events (23 vs. 21), or death (1, 0.3% in each group).

CONCLUSIONS For secondary prevention following acute MI, younger age, depression, and a complex drug treatment plan are associated with lower medication adherence. Meanwhile, adherence is increased in patients with higher insurance coverage levels and social support. Compared with the 3 drugs given separately, the use of a polypill strategy met the primary endpoint for adherence for secondary prevention following an acute MI. (C) 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume64
Issue number20
Pages (from-to)2071-2082
Number of pages12
ISSN0735-1097
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • adherence
  • polypill
  • secondary prevention
  • CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE
  • MEDICATION ADHERENCE
  • RISK-FACTORS
  • DRUGS
  • NONCOMPLIANCE
  • NONADHERENCE
  • PREVENTION
  • COUNTRIES
  • TRIAL

Cite this