TY - JOUR
T1 - Alternative sampling specimens for the molecular detection of mpox (formerly monkeypox) virus
AU - ITM MPX Study Group
AU - Coppens, Jasmine
AU - Vanroye, Fien
AU - Brosius, Isabel
AU - Liesenborghs, Laurens
AU - van Henten, Saskia
AU - Vanbaelen, Thibaut
AU - Bracke, Stefanie
AU - Berens-Riha, Nicole
AU - De Baetselier, Irith
AU - Kenyon, Chris
AU - Soentjens, Patrick
AU - Florence, Eric
AU - Van Griensven, Johan
AU - Ariën, Kevin K
AU - Jacobs, Bart K M
AU - Van den Bossche, Dorien
AU - Van Esbroeck, Marjan
AU - Vercauteren, Koen
N1 - FTX; (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - BACKGROUND: Mpox (formerly monkeypox) is a viral disease caused by the mpox virus (MPXV), endemic in Central and West Africa and currently causing a global outbreak of international concern. Much remains unknown about sample types most suited for mpox laboratory diagnosis. While it is established that high viral loads can be found in active skin lesions (currently the recommended mpox laboratory confirmation specimen type), WHO mpox testing guidelines encourage the use of oropharyngeal swabs as an additional sample type for mpox diagnosis and suggest investigating the value of other specimens like blood samples.OBJECTIVE: In this study, we verified the value of select alternative specimen types for mpox laboratory confirmation.METHODS: We included 25 patients with MPXV-confirmed skin lesions to compare diagnostic sensitivity of MPXV PCR testing on EDTA plasma and two upper respiratory specimens: oropharyngeal swabs and saliva.RESULTS: In our patient cohort with MPXV-confirmed skin lesions, diagnostic sensitivity of MPXV PCR was 80% in EDTA plasma, 64% in oropharyngeal swabs, and 88% in saliva. MPXV viral loads were significantly higher in saliva compared to oropharyngeal swabs and EDTA plasma.DISCUSSION: The WHO recommendation to collect oropharyngeal swabs as an additional specimen for mpox diagnosis might need to be revised to include saliva wherever feasible. We suggest investigating saliva as a diagnostic specimen in the absence of active skin lesions or during the phase preceding skin manifestations. Moreover, the relatively high MPXV DNA content of saliva warrants elucidating its potential role in disease transmission.
AB - BACKGROUND: Mpox (formerly monkeypox) is a viral disease caused by the mpox virus (MPXV), endemic in Central and West Africa and currently causing a global outbreak of international concern. Much remains unknown about sample types most suited for mpox laboratory diagnosis. While it is established that high viral loads can be found in active skin lesions (currently the recommended mpox laboratory confirmation specimen type), WHO mpox testing guidelines encourage the use of oropharyngeal swabs as an additional sample type for mpox diagnosis and suggest investigating the value of other specimens like blood samples.OBJECTIVE: In this study, we verified the value of select alternative specimen types for mpox laboratory confirmation.METHODS: We included 25 patients with MPXV-confirmed skin lesions to compare diagnostic sensitivity of MPXV PCR testing on EDTA plasma and two upper respiratory specimens: oropharyngeal swabs and saliva.RESULTS: In our patient cohort with MPXV-confirmed skin lesions, diagnostic sensitivity of MPXV PCR was 80% in EDTA plasma, 64% in oropharyngeal swabs, and 88% in saliva. MPXV viral loads were significantly higher in saliva compared to oropharyngeal swabs and EDTA plasma.DISCUSSION: The WHO recommendation to collect oropharyngeal swabs as an additional specimen for mpox diagnosis might need to be revised to include saliva wherever feasible. We suggest investigating saliva as a diagnostic specimen in the absence of active skin lesions or during the phase preceding skin manifestations. Moreover, the relatively high MPXV DNA content of saliva warrants elucidating its potential role in disease transmission.
KW - Edetic Acid
KW - Humans
KW - Monkeypox virus/genetics
KW - Monkeypox/diagnosis
KW - Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
KW - Polymerase Chain Reaction
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105372
DO - 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105372
M3 - A1: Web of Science-article
C2 - 36608620
SN - 1386-6532
VL - 159
JO - Journal of Clinical Virology
JF - Journal of Clinical Virology
M1 - 105372
ER -