Assessment of the validity of and adherence to sexually transmitted infection algorithms at a female sex worker clinic in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire

Bea Vuylsteke, V Ettiègne-Traoré, CK Anoma, C Bandama, PD Ghys, CE Maurice, Eddy Van Dyck, SZ Wiktor, Marie Laga

Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Algorithms for sexually transmitted infection (STI) case management were designed in a female sex worker (FSW) clinic in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, in 1993.

Goal: The goal was to evaluate the long-term validity of the algorithms for returning clients of the clinic and to assess the adherence of the health workers to their application.

Study design: A cross-sectional study was conducted from 1999 to 2000 among FSWs attending as returning clients.

Results: The prevalences of genital infections were as follows: Neisseria gonorrhoeae and/or Chlamydia trachomatis, 8.2%; Trichomonas vaginalis, 16.7%; bacterial vaginosis, 62.3%; and Candida albicans, 6.2%. The sensitivity of the algorithms was 20% and the positive predictive value was 14% for cervical infection. The proportion of cases for which all steps of the algorithm were correctly applied was 30%.

Conclusion: Algorithms for the treatment of STIs in FSWs should be periodically reevaluated and adapted to the changing population. To maintain healthcare workers' adherence to the algorithms, supervision should be ongoing and reinforced.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSexually Transmitted Diseases
Volume30
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)284-291
ISSN0148-5717
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • B780-tropical-medicine
  • Sexually transmitted diseases
  • STD
  • Case management
  • Algorithms
  • Predictive value
  • Sensitivity
  • Health personnel
  • Guideline adherence
  • C“te d'Ivoire
  • Africa-West

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of the validity of and adherence to sexually transmitted infection algorithms at a female sex worker clinic in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this