Association between bacterial vaginosis and partner concurrency: a longitudinal study

Chris R. Kenyon, Jozefien Buyze, Mark Klebanoff, Rebecca M. Brotman

Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives The study aimed to test if there was an association between prevalent bacterial vaginosis (BV) and women reporting that their partner had other partners at the same time (partner concurrency). This association has not been assessed in a longitudinal cohort.

Methods The Longitudinal Study of Vaginal Flora recruited a cohort of 3620 non-pregnant women aged 15-44years who presented for routine primary healthcare at 12 clinics in Birmingham, Alabama. Behavioural questionnaires and vaginal smears were obtained quarterly for a year and BV was defined by a Nugent score 7 or higher as well as Amsel criteria. Mixed effects logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between prevalent BV and reporting that one's partner had other partners in the preceding 3-6months time interval.

Results Nugent score prevalent BV was associated with both reporting that one's partner definitely (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.5; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.8) and possibly (aOR 1.5; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.8) engaged in partner concurrency in the preceding 3-6months time period. Prevalent BV diagnosed by Amsel criteria was similar.

Conclusions A diagnosis of prevalent BV was associated with reporting that one's partner possibly or definitely engaged in partner concurrency.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSexually Transmitted Infections
Volume94
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)75-77
Number of pages3
ISSN1368-4973
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS
  • BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE
  • EPIDEMIOLOGY (GENERAL)
  • ETHNICITY
  • SEXUAL NETWORKS
  • GRAM STAIN
  • HIV
  • INFECTIONS
  • PREVALENCE
  • WOMEN
  • RACE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association between bacterial vaginosis and partner concurrency: a longitudinal study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this