Comparison of two PCRs for detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans

A Guimaraes-Peres, F Portaels, P De Rijk, K Fisette, SR Pattyn, JP Van Vooren, PA Fonteyne

Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-articlepeer-review

Abstract

Two nested PCRs for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans were compared by using a collection of 65 clinical specimens. The first method amplifies the gene coding for 16S rRNA, and the second method amplifies a repetitive DNA sequence. The sensitivities of bacterioscopy, culture, 16S rRNA gene PCR, and repetitive-sequence PCR were 29, 34, 80, and 85%, respectively. Compared to the 16S rRNA gene PCR, the repetitive-sequence PCR was faster, easier to perform, and less expensive.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Microbiology
Volume37
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)206-208
Number of pages3
ISSN0095-1137
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Keywords

  • B780-tropical-medicine
  • Bacteriology
  • Mycobacterium ulcerans
  • Buruli ulcer
  • Laboratory medicine
  • Techniques
  • Diagnosis
  • PCR

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of two PCRs for detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this