Diagnostic performance and usability of the VISITECT CD4 semi-quantitative test for advanced HIV disease screening

Zibusiso Ndlovu, Lamin Massaquoi, Ndim Eugene Bangwen, John N. Batumba, Rachelle U. Bora, Joelle Mbuaya, Roger Nzadi, Nadine Ntabugi, Patrick Kisaka, Gisele Manciya, Ramzia Moudashirou, Harry Pangani, Patrick Mangochi, Roberta Makoko, David Van Laeken, Claude Kwitonda, Yuster Ronoh, Kuziwa Kuwenyi, Reinaldo Ortuno, Douglas MangwanyaEdmore Zvidzai, Tapiwa Mupepe, Sekesai Zinyowera, Emmanuel Fajarde, Tom Ellman

Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-articlepeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background

In sub-Saharan Africa, a third of people starting antiretroviral therapy and majority of patients returning to HIV-care after disengagement, present with advanced HIV disease (ADH), and are at high risk of mortality. Simplified and more affordable point-of-care (POC) diagnostics are required to increase access to prompt CD4 cell count screening for ambulatory and asymptomatic patients. The Visitect CD4 Lateral Flow Assay (LFA) is a disposable POC test, providing a visually interpreted result of above or below 200 CD4cells/mm(3). This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of this index test.

Methods

Consenting patients above 18years of age and eligible for CD4 testing were enrolled in Nsanje district hospital (Malawi), Gutu mission hospital (Zimbabwe) and Centre hopitalier de Kabinda (DRC). A total of 708 venous blood samples were tested in the index test and in the BD FACSCount assay (reference test method) in the laboratories (Phase 1) to determine diagnostic accuracy. A total of 433 finger-prick (FP) samples were tested on the index test at POC by clinicians (Phase 2) and a self-completed questionnaire was administered to all testers to explore usability of the index test.

Results

Among 708 patients, 67.2% were female and median CD4 was 297cells/mm(3). The sensitivity of the Visitect CD4 LFA using venous blood in the laboratory was 95.0% [95% CI: 91.3-97.5] and specificity was 81.9% [95% CI: 78.2-85.2%]. Using FP samples, the sensitivity of the Visitect CD4 LFA was 98.3% [95% CI: 95.0-99.6] and specificity was 77.2% [95% CI: 71.6-82.2%]. Usability of the Visitect CD4 LFA was high across the study sites with 97% successfully completed tests. Due to the required specific multiple incubation and procedural steps during the Visitect CD4 LFA testing, few health workers (7/26) were not confident to manage testing whilst multi-tasking in their clinical work.

Conclusions

Visitect CD4 LFA is a promising test for decentralized CD4 screening in resource-limited settings, without access to CD4 testing and and it can trigger prompt management of patients with AHD. Lay health cadres should be considered to conduct Visitect CD4 LFA testing in PHCs as well as coordinating all other POC quality assurance.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0230453
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume15
Issue number4
Number of pages11
ISSN1932-6203
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY
  • COUNTS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic performance and usability of the VISITECT CD4 semi-quantitative test for advanced HIV disease screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this