Abstract
We compared two DNA extraction methods (a semi-automated method using Maxwell(R) kit and a modified Boom method) and three amplification procedures (a single-step PCR, a nested PCR and a real-time quantitative PCR) on 74 surgical tissue specimens from clinically suspected Buruli ulcer patients. All these procedures were compared before and after decontamination.We observed that, among the procedures tested, real-time PCR after the modified Boom extraction method or a single-run PCR assay after the Maxwell(R) 16 extraction method, performed on non-decontaminated suspensions are the best for the molecular diagnosis of Mycobacterium ulcerans disease.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Microbiology |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1195-1198 |
| ISSN | 0095-1137 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- B780-tropical-medicine
- Bacterial diseases
- Buruli ulcer
- Mycobacterium ulcerans
- Molecular diagnostic techniques
- Decontamination
- DNA extraction
- Amplification
- Polymerase chain reaction
- PCR
- Comparison
- Methodology
- Smear-positive
- Laboratory techniques and procedures
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of decontamination, DNA extraction and amplification procedures on the molecular diagnosis of Mycobacterium ulcerans disease (Buruli ulcer)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver