Establishing a global regulatory floor for children's decisions about participation in clinical research

Steven Joffe, Albert J Allen, Jonathan M Davis, Elisa Koppelman, Susan Z Kornetsky, Grace Marie V. Ku, Victoria A Miller, Jennifer Preston, Lesha D Shah, Barbara E Bierer

Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-articlepeer-review


BACKGROUND: Enrolling children in clinical trials typically requires parental or guardian permission and, when appropriate, child assent. Aligning requirements across jurisdictions would facilitate multisite pediatric trials. Guidance from the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) is the best candidate for a global standard but would benefit from additional specification.

METHODS: Ethical analysis of ICH guidance for permission and assent for pediatric trials, with recommendations for clarification.

RESULTS: ICH guidance regarding permission and assent would be enhanced by additional detail in the following areas: (1) what information should be provided to parents, guardians, and children considering a trial, and how that information should be provided; (2) the definition of "assent," the criteria for when assent should be required, and the need to include children in discussions even when assent is not mandated; (3) criteria for requiring children's signatures indicating agreement; (4) greater specificity regarding children's right to decline or withdraw; and (5) clarification of when children's wish to decline or withdraw from participation may be overridden and of what the overriding process should entail.

CONCLUSION: ICH guidance provides a global standard for decision making regarding children's participation in trials. Several clarifications would facilitate the conduct of multinational pediatric research.

IMPACT: Enrolling children in clinical trials requires the permission of a parent/guardian ± the assent of the minor. Differing global regulatory requirements for enrolling children complicate the conduct of multicenter and multinational trials. The authors identify points of ambiguity and/or contradiction in the International Council for Harmonization guidelines and offer recommendations for a common ethical platform for conducting global pediatric research.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPediatric Research
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)462-465
Number of pages4
Publication statusPublished - 2023


Dive into the research topics of 'Establishing a global regulatory floor for children's decisions about participation in clinical research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this