TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins as targets for antibody detection in severe and mild COVID-19 cases using a Luminex bead-based assay
AU - Mariën, Joachim
AU - Ceulemans, Ann
AU - Michiels, Johan
AU - Heyndrickx, Leo
AU - Kerkhof, Karen
AU - Foque, Nikki
AU - Widdowson, Marc-Alain
AU - Mortgat, Laure
AU - Duysburgh, Els
AU - Desombere, Isabelle
AU - Jansens, Hilde
AU - Van Esbroeck, Marjan
AU - Ariën, Kevin K
N1 - FTX; OGOA; (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0); Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Large-scale serosurveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) will only be possible if serological tests are sufficiently reliable, rapid and affordable. Many assays are either labour-intensive and require specialised facilities (e.g. virus neutralization assays), or are expensive with suboptimal specificity (e.g. commercial ELISAs and RDTs). Bead-based assays offer a cost-effective alternative and allow for multiplexing to test for antibodies against multiple antigens and against other pathogens. Here, we compare the performance of spike (S) and nucleocapsid (NP) antigens for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies in a panel of sera that includes recent (up to six weeks after symptom onset, severe n = 44; and mild cases n = 52) and old infections (five months after symptom onset, mild n = 104), using a Luminex-bead based assay and comparison to a virus neutralization test. While we show that neutralizing antibody levels are significantly lower in mild than in severe cases, we demonstrate that a combination of the recombinant nucleocapsid protein (NP) and receptor-binding domain (RBD) results in highly specific (99 %) IgG antibody detection five months after infection in 96 % of cases. Although most severe Covid-19 cases developed a clear IgM and IgA response, titers fell below the detection threshold in more than 20 % of mild cases in our bead-based assay. In conclusion, our data supports the use of RBD and NP for the development of SARS-CoV-2 serological IgG bead-based assays.
AB - Large-scale serosurveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) will only be possible if serological tests are sufficiently reliable, rapid and affordable. Many assays are either labour-intensive and require specialised facilities (e.g. virus neutralization assays), or are expensive with suboptimal specificity (e.g. commercial ELISAs and RDTs). Bead-based assays offer a cost-effective alternative and allow for multiplexing to test for antibodies against multiple antigens and against other pathogens. Here, we compare the performance of spike (S) and nucleocapsid (NP) antigens for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies in a panel of sera that includes recent (up to six weeks after symptom onset, severe n = 44; and mild cases n = 52) and old infections (five months after symptom onset, mild n = 104), using a Luminex-bead based assay and comparison to a virus neutralization test. While we show that neutralizing antibody levels are significantly lower in mild than in severe cases, we demonstrate that a combination of the recombinant nucleocapsid protein (NP) and receptor-binding domain (RBD) results in highly specific (99 %) IgG antibody detection five months after infection in 96 % of cases. Although most severe Covid-19 cases developed a clear IgM and IgA response, titers fell below the detection threshold in more than 20 % of mild cases in our bead-based assay. In conclusion, our data supports the use of RBD and NP for the development of SARS-CoV-2 serological IgG bead-based assays.
KW - Antibodies, Neutralizing
KW - Antibodies, Viral/immunology
KW - COVID-19/diagnosis
KW - Humans
KW - Immunoassay/methods
KW - Immunoglobulin A/blood
KW - Immunoglobulin G/blood
KW - Immunoglobulin M/blood
KW - Neutralization Tests
KW - Nucleocapsid Proteins/immunology
KW - ROC Curve
KW - SARS-CoV-2/immunology
KW - Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology
U2 - 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.114025
DO - 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.114025
M3 - A1: Web of Science-article
C2 - 33227340
SN - 0166-0934
VL - 288
JO - Journal of Virological Methods
JF - Journal of Virological Methods
M1 - 114025
ER -