TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of InTray cassettes directly from blood cultures for the diagnosis of sepsis in clinical bacteriology laboratories as an alternative to classic culture media
AU - Mini Lab Scientif Committe
AU - Natale, A
AU - Oueslati, S
AU - Rochard, A
AU - Ombelet, S
AU - Lopez-Baez, D
AU - Hardy, L
AU - Cunningham, J
AU - Franquesa, C
AU - Vandenberg, O
AU - Ronat, JB
AU - Naas, T
N1 - FTX; DOAJ; (CC BY)
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Culture media is fundamental in clinical bacteriology for the detection and isolation of bacterial pathogens. However, in-house media preparation could be challenging in low-resource settings. InTray® cassettes (Biomed Diagnostics) could be a valid alternative as they are compact, ready-to-use media preparations. In this study, we evaluate the use of two InTray media as a subculture alternative for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections: the InTray® Müller-Hinton (MH) chocolate and the InTray® Colorex™ Screen. The InTray MH chocolate was evaluated in 2 steps: firstly, using simulated positive blood cultures (reference evaluation study), and secondly, using positive blood cultures from a routine clinical laboratory (clinical evaluation study). The Colorex Screen was tested using simulated poly-microbial blood cultures. The sensitivity and specificity of the InTray MH chocolate were respectively 99.2% and 90% in the reference evaluation study and 97.1% and 88.2% in the clinical evaluation study. The time to detection (TTD) was ≤20 h in most positive blood cultures (99.8% and 97% in the two studies, respectively). The InTray® MH Chocolate agar showed good performance when used directly from clinical blood cultures for single bacterial infections. However, mixed flora is more challenging to interpret on this media than on Colorex™ Screen, even for an experienced microbiologist.
AB - Culture media is fundamental in clinical bacteriology for the detection and isolation of bacterial pathogens. However, in-house media preparation could be challenging in low-resource settings. InTray® cassettes (Biomed Diagnostics) could be a valid alternative as they are compact, ready-to-use media preparations. In this study, we evaluate the use of two InTray media as a subculture alternative for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections: the InTray® Müller-Hinton (MH) chocolate and the InTray® Colorex™ Screen. The InTray MH chocolate was evaluated in 2 steps: firstly, using simulated positive blood cultures (reference evaluation study), and secondly, using positive blood cultures from a routine clinical laboratory (clinical evaluation study). The Colorex Screen was tested using simulated poly-microbial blood cultures. The sensitivity and specificity of the InTray MH chocolate were respectively 99.2% and 90% in the reference evaluation study and 97.1% and 88.2% in the clinical evaluation study. The time to detection (TTD) was ≤20 h in most positive blood cultures (99.8% and 97% in the two studies, respectively). The InTray® MH Chocolate agar showed good performance when used directly from clinical blood cultures for single bacterial infections. However, mixed flora is more challenging to interpret on this media than on Colorex™ Screen, even for an experienced microbiologist.
KW - Colorex (TM) screen
KW - InTray cassettes
KW - InTray((R)) Muller-Hinton (MH) chocolate
KW - LMICs
KW - Blood cultures
KW - Bloodstream infection
KW - Clinical bacteriology in low resource settings
KW - Diagnosis of sepsis
KW - Polymicrobial infections
KW - Subcultures
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=itm_wosliteitg&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000931658900001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.3390/diagnostics13030523
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics13030523
M3 - A1: Web of Science-article
C2 - 36766628
VL - 13
JO - Diagnostics
JF - Diagnostics
IS - 3
M1 - 523
ER -