Evidence-based vector control? Improving the quality of vector control trials

Anne L Wilson, Marleen Boelaert, Immo Kleinschmidt, Margaret Pinder, Thomas W Scott, Lucy S Tusting, Steve W Lindsay

Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-article

Abstract

Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) such as malaria, dengue, and leishmaniasis cause a high level of morbidity and mortality. Although vector control tools can play a major role in controlling and eliminating these diseases, in many cases the evidence base for assessing the efficacy of vector control interventions is limited or not available. Studies assessing the efficacy of vector control interventions are often poorly conducted, which limits the return on investment of research funding. Here we outline the principal design features of Phase III vector control field studies, highlight major failings and strengths of published studies, and provide guidance on improving the design and conduct of vector control studies. We hope that this critical assessment will increase the impetus for more carefully considered and rigorous design of vector control studies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTrends In Parasitology
Volume31
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)380-390
ISSN1471-4922
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-based vector control? Improving the quality of vector control trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this