TY - JOUR
T1 - Existence and functionality of emergency obstetric care services at district level in Kenya: theoretical coverage versus reality
AU - Echoka, E.
AU - Kombe, Y.
AU - Dubourg, D.
AU - Makokha, A.
AU - Evjen-Olsen, B.
AU - Mwangi, M.
AU - Byskov, J.
AU - Olsen, O.E.
AU - Mutisya, R.
N1 - ITG-H3A; DPH; U-MRH; JIF; DOI; URL; E-only; PDF; Abstract; DSPACE56
FTX
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - BACKGROUND: The knowledge on emergency obstetric care (EmOC) is limited in Kenya, where only partial data from sub-national studies exist. The EmOC process indicators have also not been integrated into routine health management information system to monitor progress in safe motherhood interventions both at national and lower levels of the health system. In a country with a high maternal mortality burden, the implication is that decision makers are unaware of the extent of need for life-saving care and, therefore, where to intervene. The objective of the study was to assess the actual existence and functionality of EmOC services at district level. METHODS: This was a facility-based cross-sectional study. Data were collected from 40 health facilities offering delivery services in Malindi District, Kenya. Data presented are part of the "Response to accountable priority setting for trust in health systems" (REACT) study, in which EmOC was one of the service areas selected to assess fairness and legitimacy of priority setting in health care. The main outcome measures in this study were the number of facilities providing EmOC, their geographical distribution, and caesarean section rates in relation to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. RESULTS: Among the 40 facilities assessed, 29 were government owned, seven were private and four were voluntary organisations. The ratio of EmOC facilities to population size was met (6.2/500,000), compared to the recommended 5/500,000. However, using the strict WHO definition, none of the facilities met the EmOC requirements, since assisted delivery, by vacuum or forceps was not provided in any facility. Rural-urban inequities in geographical distribution of facilities were observed. The facilities were not providing sufficient life-saving care as measured by caesarean section rates, which were below recommended levels (3.7% in 2008 and 4.5% in 2009). The rates were lower in the rural than in urban areas (2.1% vs. 6.8%; p <0.001 ) in 2008 and (2.7% vs. 7.7%; p <0.001) in 2009. CONCLUSIONS: The gaps in existence and functionality of EmOC services revealed in this study may point to the health system conditions contributing to lack of improvements in maternal survival in Kenya. As such, the findings bear considerable implications for policy and local priority setting.
AB - BACKGROUND: The knowledge on emergency obstetric care (EmOC) is limited in Kenya, where only partial data from sub-national studies exist. The EmOC process indicators have also not been integrated into routine health management information system to monitor progress in safe motherhood interventions both at national and lower levels of the health system. In a country with a high maternal mortality burden, the implication is that decision makers are unaware of the extent of need for life-saving care and, therefore, where to intervene. The objective of the study was to assess the actual existence and functionality of EmOC services at district level. METHODS: This was a facility-based cross-sectional study. Data were collected from 40 health facilities offering delivery services in Malindi District, Kenya. Data presented are part of the "Response to accountable priority setting for trust in health systems" (REACT) study, in which EmOC was one of the service areas selected to assess fairness and legitimacy of priority setting in health care. The main outcome measures in this study were the number of facilities providing EmOC, their geographical distribution, and caesarean section rates in relation to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. RESULTS: Among the 40 facilities assessed, 29 were government owned, seven were private and four were voluntary organisations. The ratio of EmOC facilities to population size was met (6.2/500,000), compared to the recommended 5/500,000. However, using the strict WHO definition, none of the facilities met the EmOC requirements, since assisted delivery, by vacuum or forceps was not provided in any facility. Rural-urban inequities in geographical distribution of facilities were observed. The facilities were not providing sufficient life-saving care as measured by caesarean section rates, which were below recommended levels (3.7% in 2008 and 4.5% in 2009). The rates were lower in the rural than in urban areas (2.1% vs. 6.8%; p <0.001 ) in 2008 and (2.7% vs. 7.7%; p <0.001) in 2009. CONCLUSIONS: The gaps in existence and functionality of EmOC services revealed in this study may point to the health system conditions contributing to lack of improvements in maternal survival in Kenya. As such, the findings bear considerable implications for policy and local priority setting.
KW - Maternal health care
KW - Emergency obstetric care
KW - Health services
KW - Obstetric services
KW - Evaluation
KW - Monitoring
KW - Organization
KW - Health care delivery
KW - Public health services
KW - Private sector
KW - Volunteers
KW - Birth
KW - Cesarean sections
KW - Rural
KW - Urban
KW - Kenya
KW - Africa-East
U2 - 10.1186/1472-6963-13-113
DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-13-113
M3 - A1: Web of Science-article
VL - 13
SP - 113
JO - BMC Health Services Research
JF - BMC Health Services Research
SN - 1472-6963
ER -