Abstract
In this article, I set out to capture the dynamics of two streams within the field of global health research: realist research and medical anthropology. I critically discuss the development of methodology and practice in realist health research in low- and middle-income countries against the background of anthropological practice in global health to make claims on why realist enquiry has taken a high flight. I argue that in order to provide a contribution to today's complex global issues, we need to adopt a pragmatic stance and move past disciplinary silos: both methodologies have the potential to be well-suited to an analysis of deep layers of context and of key social mechanisms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Anthropology in Action |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 42-51 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| ISSN | 0967-201X |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- ethnography
- global health
- low- and middle-income countries
- medical anthropology
- realist evaluation
- MEDICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
- SOCIAL-SCIENCE
- PUBLIC-HEALTH
- CHALLENGE
- FIELD