Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to identify and differentiate Mycobacterium kansasii and Mycobacterium chelonae-Mycobacterium abscessus group strains isolated from clinical and environmental sources in different countries. METHODS: PCR-restriction analysis of the hsp65 gene (PRA) with automated capillary electrophoresis was applied to the isolates previously identified by conventional biochemical testing and the molecular INNO-LiPA MYCOBACTERIA assay. RESULTS: PRA performed very well in comparison with the two other methods (96.4% concordance). Among 27M. kansasii isolates, this method detected five genetic types, of which type 1 represented the most common clinical isolate, as it is worldwide. PRA differentiated 29M. chelonae-M. abscessus group isolates into Mycobacterium immunogenum type 2 (n=13), M. chelonae (n=12), and M. abscessus types 1 (n=1) and 2 (n=1). M. immunogenum was the most frequent (69%) isolate from humans, but only one of 11 cases was clinically significant. M. chelonae was the most commonly (83%) recovered from water. PRA also identified two isolates with hsp65 alleles representing previously unreported patterns. CONCLUSIONS: PRA based on automated capillary electrophoresis is a rapid, simple, and reliable method for the identification and differentiation of both clinically relevant and environmental isolates of M. kansasii and M. chelonae-M. abscessus group.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | International Journal of Infectious Diseases |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 3 |
Pages (from-to) | e193-e197 |
ISSN | 1201-9712 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- B780-tropical-medicine
- Bacterial diseases
- Tuberculosis
- Leprosy
- Mycobacterium kansasii
- Mycobacterium chelonae
- Mycobacterium abscessus
- Molecular diagnostic techniques
- Species
- Identification
- Differentiation
- Polymerase chain reaction
- PCR-restriction analysis
- Electrophoresis
- Laboratory techniques and procedures