TY - JOUR
T1 - In vitro susceptibility of Leishmania donovani to miltefosine in Indian visceral leishmaniasis
AU - Prajapati, V.K.
AU - Sharma, S.
AU - Rai, M.
AU - Ostyn, B.
AU - Salotra, P.
AU - Vanaerschot, M.
AU - Dujardin, J.C.
AU - Sundar, S.
N1 - FTX; ITG-H4B; ITG-B6B; ITG-B7A; MULTI; DPH; U-ECTD; DBM; U-MOLPAR; JIF; DOI; PDF; Abstract; DSPACE56; NOKW
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Promastigote miltefosine (MIL) susceptibility was performed on Leishmania donovani isolates from Indian patients with visceral leishmaniasis treated with MIL. Isolates that were obtained before the onset of MIL treatment, after completion of treatment (29th day), or at the time of treatment failure, were screened using in vitro promastigote assay. The MIL susceptibility of the pre-treatment isolates (N = 24, mean IC50 +/- SEM = 3.74 +/- 0.38 muM) was significantly higher than that of the post-treatment group (N = 26, mean IC50 +/- SEM = 6.15 +/- 0.52 muM; P = 0.0006) but was similar in the cured patients (N = 22, mean IC50 +/- SEM = 5.58 +/- 0.56 muM) and those who failed treatment (N = 28, mean IC50 +/- SEM = 4.53 +/- 0.47 muM). The pre/post-treatment results thus showed a 2-fold difference, whereas isolated from cured versus failed patients showed a similar susceptibility, suggesting that this higher tolerance is not responsible for MIL-treatment failure. Our work highlights the need for careful monitoring of MIL susceptibility for implementation in national VL elimination programs.
AB - Promastigote miltefosine (MIL) susceptibility was performed on Leishmania donovani isolates from Indian patients with visceral leishmaniasis treated with MIL. Isolates that were obtained before the onset of MIL treatment, after completion of treatment (29th day), or at the time of treatment failure, were screened using in vitro promastigote assay. The MIL susceptibility of the pre-treatment isolates (N = 24, mean IC50 +/- SEM = 3.74 +/- 0.38 muM) was significantly higher than that of the post-treatment group (N = 26, mean IC50 +/- SEM = 6.15 +/- 0.52 muM; P = 0.0006) but was similar in the cured patients (N = 22, mean IC50 +/- SEM = 5.58 +/- 0.56 muM) and those who failed treatment (N = 28, mean IC50 +/- SEM = 4.53 +/- 0.47 muM). The pre/post-treatment results thus showed a 2-fold difference, whereas isolated from cured versus failed patients showed a similar susceptibility, suggesting that this higher tolerance is not responsible for MIL-treatment failure. Our work highlights the need for careful monitoring of MIL susceptibility for implementation in national VL elimination programs.
U2 - 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0096
DO - 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0096
M3 - A1: Web of Science-article
C2 - 23980130
SN - 0002-9637
VL - 89
SP - 750
EP - 754
JO - American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
JF - American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
IS - 4
ER -