Lay attitudes and misconceptions and their implications for the control of brucellosis in an agro-pastoral community in Kilombero district, Tanzania

Caroline M. Mburu, Salome A. Bukachi, Kathrin H. Tokpa, Gilbert Fokou, Khamati Shilabukha, Mangi Ezekiel, Bassirou Bonfoh, Rudovick Kazwala, Katharina Kreppel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Brucellosis is a priority zoonotic disease in Tanzania that causes ill-health in people and affects livestock productivity. Inadequate awareness and behavior risking transmission can impede control efforts. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 333 livestock owners in three villages in the Kilombero district, Tanzania, to understand their awareness, knowledge and behavior associated with brucellosis. Six Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), two in each village, were conducted, as well as an additional FGD with male herders from one of the villages. Factors associated with knowledge on brucellosis, food consumption and animal husbandry behavior risking transmission of this disease, were identified using generalized linear models. Predictors for knowledge of brucellosis were being male and having a higher educational level, while age was positively associated with a higher level of knowledge. Faith and ethnicity were associated with the performance of practices risking transmission. Following traditional religion and belonging to the Wamaasai ethnicity significantly increased the odds of carrying out these practices. Qualitative analysis gave insight into risk practices and reasoning. Of the 333 respondents, 29% reported that they had experienced abortions in their herds, 14% witnessed retained placentas, and 8% had seen still-births in their cattle within the previous year. However, survey results also showed that only 7.2% of participants had heard about brucellosis as a disease in livestock. Of those who had heard about brucellosis in livestock, 91% associated abortions with it and 71% knew that humans can get infected through raw milk consumption. People overwhelmingly attributed symptoms and transmission of brucellosis in livestock to infection with trypanosomiasis and to supernatural reasons instead. In the community, consumption of raw milk was valued and handling of aborted material was not considered a risk for infection. This agro-pastoralist community holds on to long-held beliefs and practices and lacks understanding of the biomedical concept of brucellosis. Transmission routes and symptoms of brucellosis in humans and livestock are completely unknown. The disparity between risk perception and actual transmission risk related to animal handling and consumption of animal products presents a challenge for disease awareness communication. This study recommends focused community engagement and sensitization to address the limited awareness and misconceptions among agro-pastoralists.

Author summary Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease, causing abortion, retained placenta, infertility and reduced milk production in livestock and wildlife. In humans it leads to a febrile-like illness with headaches, joint pains, weight loss and arthritis. Approximately 500,000 people are diagnosed with brucellosis each year, mainly in sub-Saharan Africa. Risk factors for transmission are handling aborted material, residing with livestock and consuming raw milk and blood. Due to the cultural attachment that agro-pastoralists have with their livestock, they are most affected and it is a challenging disease to control. We conducted a study with agro-pastoralists in three villages, neighboring wildlife conservation areas, in south-central Tanzania. The majority of those interviewed did not know about brucellosis, its symptoms and risk factors for people and livestock. Symptoms associated with brucellosis infection in animals are recognized but are attributed to the disease trypanosomiasis and to supernatural reasons instead. Age, education and gender, as well as religious orientation and ethnicity were factors associated with knowledge and following risky practices. Behavior like consuming raw milk and blood, handling aborted material and co-habiting with livestock are considered an important part of life. We therefore suggest to policy makers, researchers and public health workers to engage with local communities and respond to their questions and concerns so that culturally and contextually relevant solutions are developed to control this disease.

Original languageEnglish
Article number0009500
JournalPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Volume15
Issue number6
Number of pages22
ISSN1935-2735
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun-2021

Keywords

  • NOMADIC PASTORALISTS
  • RISK-FACTORS
  • PERCEPTIONS
  • KNOWLEDGE
  • LIVESTOCK

Cite this