TY - JOUR
T1 - Parasite detection in food: current status and future needs for validation
AU - Chalmers, Rachel M.
AU - Robertson, Lucy J.
AU - Dorny, Pierre
AU - Jordan, Suzanne
AU - Karssin, Age
AU - Katzer, Frank
AU - La Carbona, Stephanie
AU - Lalle, Marco
AU - Lassen, Brian
AU - Mladineo, Ivona
AU - Rozycki, Miroslaw
AU - Bilska-Zajac, Ewa
AU - Schares, Gereon
AU - Mayer-Scholl, Anne
AU - Trevisan, Chiara
AU - Tysnes, Kristoffer
AU - Vasilev, Sasa
AU - Klotz, Christian
N1 - OGOA; FTX; (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background: Many parasites (protozoa and helminths) can be transmitted through food and lead to infections with high morbidity, as well as disease outbreaks. Although the importance of foodborne parasites (FBP) is recognised by many sectors of the food industry, standardized analytical methods and validation procedures for testing food for FBP are lacking.Scope and approach:Current methods for detection of FBP, and their validation, are critically reviewed, focusing on priority FBP in Europe: the helminths Echinococcus multilocularis, Echinococcus granulosus, Taenia saginata, Trichinella spp., and Anisakidae, and the protozoa Toxoplasma gondii, Cryptosporidium spp., and Giardia duodenalis.Key findings and conclusions:Standard methods exist for detection of T. saginata in beef, and Trichinella spp. in meat (and are mandatory at meat inspection in Europe), Anisakidae in fish, and Cryptosporidium spp. and G. duodenalis in leafy green vegetables and berry fruits. For other FBP or foods, methods used in sample surveys have been described, but validation data are generally absent; limits of detection are not provided, ring trials have rarely been performed, and for most FBP quality control materials, proficiency schemes, and reference standards are lacking. The use of surrogate particles or organisms for method development or validation purposes needs to be carefully considered. Documented procedures for validation, such as ISO17468 and ISO16140-2:2016 that were established for bacteria, are mostly inappropriate for FBP. The development and application of standardized and validated detection methods would enhance understanding of the foodborne route of transmission, improve risk assessments, and help identify and verify critical control points.
AB - Background: Many parasites (protozoa and helminths) can be transmitted through food and lead to infections with high morbidity, as well as disease outbreaks. Although the importance of foodborne parasites (FBP) is recognised by many sectors of the food industry, standardized analytical methods and validation procedures for testing food for FBP are lacking.Scope and approach:Current methods for detection of FBP, and their validation, are critically reviewed, focusing on priority FBP in Europe: the helminths Echinococcus multilocularis, Echinococcus granulosus, Taenia saginata, Trichinella spp., and Anisakidae, and the protozoa Toxoplasma gondii, Cryptosporidium spp., and Giardia duodenalis.Key findings and conclusions:Standard methods exist for detection of T. saginata in beef, and Trichinella spp. in meat (and are mandatory at meat inspection in Europe), Anisakidae in fish, and Cryptosporidium spp. and G. duodenalis in leafy green vegetables and berry fruits. For other FBP or foods, methods used in sample surveys have been described, but validation data are generally absent; limits of detection are not provided, ring trials have rarely been performed, and for most FBP quality control materials, proficiency schemes, and reference standards are lacking. The use of surrogate particles or organisms for method development or validation purposes needs to be carefully considered. Documented procedures for validation, such as ISO17468 and ISO16140-2:2016 that were established for bacteria, are mostly inappropriate for FBP. The development and application of standardized and validated detection methods would enhance understanding of the foodborne route of transmission, improve risk assessments, and help identify and verify critical control points.
KW - Foodborne
KW - Parasite
KW - Detection methods
KW - Validation
KW - CRYPTOSPORIDIUM-PARVUM OOCYSTS
KW - POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION
KW - TAENIA-SAGINATA CYSTICERCOSIS
KW - TRANSMISSION STAGES EFFICACY
KW - TOXOPLASMA-GONDII DETECTION
KW - BOVINE CYSTICERCOSIS
KW - IMMUNOMAGNETIC SEPARATION
KW - ANISAKIS-PEGREFFII
KW - VISUAL INSPECTION
KW - ECHINOCOCCUS-MULTILOCULARIS
U2 - 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.011
DO - 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.011
M3 - A1: Web of Science-article
SN - 0924-2244
VL - 99
SP - 337
EP - 350
JO - Trends in Food Science & Technology
JF - Trends in Food Science & Technology
ER -