Pitfalls of bacterial pan-genome analysis approaches: a case study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and two less clonal bacterial species

Pan-genome analysis is a fundamental tool for studying bacterial genome evolution; however, the variety in methods used to define and measure the pan-genome poses challenges to the interpretation and reliability of results. Using Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a clonally evolving bacterium with a small accessory genome, as a model system, we systematically evaluated sources of variability in pan-genome estimates. Our analysis revealed that differences in assembly type (short-read versus hybrid), annotation pipeline, and pan-genome software, significantly impact predictions of core and accessory genome size. Extending our analysis to two additional bacterial species, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, we observed consistent tool-dependent biases but species-specific patterns in pan-genome variability. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating nucleotide- and protein-level analyses to improve the reliability and reproducibility of pan-genome studies across diverse bacterial populations.