TY - JOUR
T1 - Standardised shorter regimens versus individualised longer regimens for rifampin- or multidrug-resistant tuberculosis
AU - Abidi, Syed
AU - Achar, Jay
AU - Neino, Mourtala Mohamed Assao
AU - Bang, Didi
AU - Benedetti, Andrea
AU - Brode, Sarah
AU - Campbell, Jonathon R.
AU - Casas, Esther C.
AU - Conradie, Francesca
AU - Dravniece, Gunta
AU - du Cros, Philipp
AU - Falzon, Dennis
AU - Jaramillo, Ernesto
AU - Kuaban, Christopher
AU - Lan, Zhiyi
AU - Lange, Christoph
AU - Li, Pei Zhi
AU - Makhmudova, Mavluda
AU - Maug, Aung Kya Jai
AU - Menzies, Dick
AU - Migliori, Giovanni Battista
AU - Miller, Ann
AU - Myrzaliev, Bakyt
AU - Ndjeka, Norbert
AU - Noeske, Juergen
AU - Parpieva, Nargiza
AU - Piubello, Alberto
AU - Schwoebel, Valerie
AU - Sikhondze, Welile
AU - Singla, Rupak
AU - Souleymane, Mahamadou Bassirou
AU - Trebucq, Arnaud
AU - Van Deun, Armand
AU - Viney, Kerri
AU - Weyer, Karin
AU - Zhang, Betty Jingxuan
AU - Khan, Faiz Ahmad
N1 - NPP
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - We sought to compare the effectiveness of two World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended regimens for the treatment of rifampin- or multidrug-resistant (RR/MDR) tuberculosis (TB): a standardised regimen of 9-12 months (the "shorter regimen") and individualised regimens of >= 20 months ("longer regimens").We collected individual patient data from observational studies identified through systematic reviews and a public call for data. We included patients meeting WHO eligibility criteria for the shorter regimen: not previously treated with second-line drugs, and with fluoroquinolone- and second-line injectable agent-susceptible RR/MDR-TB. We used propensity score matched, mixed effects meta-regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios and adjusted risk differences (aRDs) for failure or relapse, death within 12 months of treatment initiation and loss to follow-up.We included 2625 out of 3378 (77.7%) individuals from nine studies of shorter regimens and 2717 out of 13 104 (20.7%) individuals from 53 studies of longer regimens. Treatment success was higher with the shorter regimen than with longer regimens (pooled proportions 80.0% versus 75.3%), due to less loss to follow-up with the former (aRD -0.15, 95% CI -0.17-0.12). The risk difference for failure or relapse was slightly higher with the shorter regimen overall (aRD 0.02, 95% CI 0-0.05) and greater in magnitude with baseline resistance to pyrazinamide (aRD 0.12, 95% CI 0.07-0.16), prothionamide/ethionamide (aRD 0.07, 95% CI -0.01-0.16) or ethambutol (aRD 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.13).In patients meeting WHO criteria for its use, the standardised shorter regimen was associated with substantially less loss to follow-up during treatment compared with individualised longer regimens and with more failure or relapse in the presence of resistance to component medications. Our findings support the need to improve access to reliable drug susceptibility testing.
AB - We sought to compare the effectiveness of two World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended regimens for the treatment of rifampin- or multidrug-resistant (RR/MDR) tuberculosis (TB): a standardised regimen of 9-12 months (the "shorter regimen") and individualised regimens of >= 20 months ("longer regimens").We collected individual patient data from observational studies identified through systematic reviews and a public call for data. We included patients meeting WHO eligibility criteria for the shorter regimen: not previously treated with second-line drugs, and with fluoroquinolone- and second-line injectable agent-susceptible RR/MDR-TB. We used propensity score matched, mixed effects meta-regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios and adjusted risk differences (aRDs) for failure or relapse, death within 12 months of treatment initiation and loss to follow-up.We included 2625 out of 3378 (77.7%) individuals from nine studies of shorter regimens and 2717 out of 13 104 (20.7%) individuals from 53 studies of longer regimens. Treatment success was higher with the shorter regimen than with longer regimens (pooled proportions 80.0% versus 75.3%), due to less loss to follow-up with the former (aRD -0.15, 95% CI -0.17-0.12). The risk difference for failure or relapse was slightly higher with the shorter regimen overall (aRD 0.02, 95% CI 0-0.05) and greater in magnitude with baseline resistance to pyrazinamide (aRD 0.12, 95% CI 0.07-0.16), prothionamide/ethionamide (aRD 0.07, 95% CI -0.01-0.16) or ethambutol (aRD 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.13).In patients meeting WHO criteria for its use, the standardised shorter regimen was associated with substantially less loss to follow-up during treatment compared with individualised longer regimens and with more failure or relapse in the presence of resistance to component medications. Our findings support the need to improve access to reliable drug susceptibility testing.
KW - TREATMENT OUTCOMES
KW - MYCOBACTERIUM-TUBERCULOSIS
KW - CHAINED EQUATIONS
KW - DRUG-RESISTANCE
KW - SUSCEPTIBILITY
KW - BEDAQUILINE
KW - IMPUTATION
KW - 1ST
U2 - 10.1183/13993003.01467-2019
DO - 10.1183/13993003.01467-2019
M3 - A1: Web of Science-article
SN - 0903-1936
VL - 55
JO - European Respiratory Journal
JF - European Respiratory Journal
IS - 3
M1 - 1901467
ER -