Abstract
Two surveys of over 1,700 publications whose authors use quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) reveal a lack of transparent and comprehensive reporting of essential technical information. Reporting standards are significantly improved in publications that cite the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines, although such publications are still vastly outnumbered by those that do not.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Nature Methods |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1063-1067 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| ISSN | 1548-7091 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- Detection
- Polymerase chain reaction
- PCR
- Information
- Quantitative research
- Guideline adherence
- Journal impact factors
- Scientific literature
- Review of the literature
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The need for transparency and good practices in the qPCR literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver