The predictive validity of SIS/SES and BIS/BAS scores for sexual and non-sexual risk behavior

Jacques JDM van Lankveld; Tom Platteau; Kristie van Montfort; Fons Nieuwenhuijs; Jef Syroit

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.048

The predictive validity of SIS/SES and BIS/BAS scores for sexual and non-sexual risk behavior

Jacques JDM van Lankveld, Tom Platteau, Kristie van Montfort, Fons Nieuwenhuijs, Jef Syroit

HIV/STI Clinic

Research output: Contribution to journal › A1: Web of Science-article › peer-review

Abstract

The theoretical proximity of the Dual-Control Model of the Sexual Response and the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory predicts at least moderate-size correlations of measurements based on these models. However, sexual inhibition has also been claimed to be domain-specific, suggesting smaller-size correlations and superior prediction of sexual outcomes using measures of sexual inhibition and excitation, compared with generic measures. The aim of this study (N = 254) was to investigate the predictive validity of the Sexual Inhibition and Sexual Excitation Scale (SIS/SES) for, respectively, sexual and non-sexual risk behavior beyond prediction using scores on the Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS). Both instruments, however, were found to contribute to the prediction of both types of risk behavior. The findings were interpreted as providing only partial support for the notion of domain specificity of sexual inhibition and excitation.

Original language	English
Journal	Personality and Individual Differences
Volume	79
Pages (from-to)	7-12
Number of pages	6
ISSN	0191-8869
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.048
Publication status	Published - 2015

Access to Document

10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.048

Cite this

@article{5aceaf2bbbd848289bcf3acb97537135,

title = "The predictive validity of SIS/SES and BIS/BAS scores for sexual and non-sexual risk behavior",

abstract = "The theoretical proximity of the Dual-Control Model of the Sexual Response and the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory predicts at least moderate-size correlations of measurements based on these models. However, sexual inhibition has also been claimed to be domain-specific, suggesting smaller-size correlations and superior prediction of sexual outcomes using measures of sexual inhibition and excitation, compared with generic measures. The aim of this study (N = 254) was to investigate the predictive validity of the Sexual Inhibition and Sexual Excitation Scale (SIS/SES) for, respectively, sexual and non-sexual risk behavior beyond prediction using scores on the Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS). Both instruments, however, were found to contribute to the prediction of both types of risk behavior. The findings were interpreted as providing only partial support for the notion of domain specificity of sexual inhibition and excitation.",

author = "{van Lankveld}, {Jacques JDM} and Tom Platteau and {van Montfort}, Kristie and Fons Nieuwenhuijs and Jef Syroit",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.048",

language = "English",

volume = "79",

pages = "7--12",

journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",

issn = "0191-8869",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The predictive validity of SIS/SES and BIS/BAS scores for sexual and non-sexual risk behavior

AU - van Lankveld, Jacques JDM

AU - Platteau, Tom

AU - van Montfort, Kristie

AU - Nieuwenhuijs, Fons

AU - Syroit, Jef

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The theoretical proximity of the Dual-Control Model of the Sexual Response and the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory predicts at least moderate-size correlations of measurements based on these models. However, sexual inhibition has also been claimed to be domain-specific, suggesting smaller-size correlations and superior prediction of sexual outcomes using measures of sexual inhibition and excitation, compared with generic measures. The aim of this study (N = 254) was to investigate the predictive validity of the Sexual Inhibition and Sexual Excitation Scale (SIS/SES) for, respectively, sexual and non-sexual risk behavior beyond prediction using scores on the Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS). Both instruments, however, were found to contribute to the prediction of both types of risk behavior. The findings were interpreted as providing only partial support for the notion of domain specificity of sexual inhibition and excitation.

AB - The theoretical proximity of the Dual-Control Model of the Sexual Response and the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory predicts at least moderate-size correlations of measurements based on these models. However, sexual inhibition has also been claimed to be domain-specific, suggesting smaller-size correlations and superior prediction of sexual outcomes using measures of sexual inhibition and excitation, compared with generic measures. The aim of this study (N = 254) was to investigate the predictive validity of the Sexual Inhibition and Sexual Excitation Scale (SIS/SES) for, respectively, sexual and non-sexual risk behavior beyond prediction using scores on the Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS). Both instruments, however, were found to contribute to the prediction of both types of risk behavior. The findings were interpreted as providing only partial support for the notion of domain specificity of sexual inhibition and excitation.

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.048

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.048

M3 - A1: Web of Science-article

VL - 79

SP - 7

EP - 12

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

ER -