TY - JOUR
T1 - The validity of cerebrospinal fluid parameters for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis
AU - Solari, L.
AU - Soto, A.
AU - Agapito, J.C.
AU - Acurio, V.
AU - Vargas, D.
AU - Battaglioli, T.
AU - Accinelli, R.A.
AU - Gotuzzo, E.
AU - Van der Stuyft, P.
N1 - NPP; ITG-H1B; ITG-H2B; ITG-H6B; ITG-HLA; DPH; U-ECTB; JIF; DOI; PDF; Abstract; DSPACE56; NOKW
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic validity of laboratory cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters for discriminating between tuberculous meningitis (TBM) and other causes of meningeal syndrome in high tuberculosis incidence settings. METHODS: From November 2009 to November 2011, we included patients with a clinical suspicion of meningitis attending two hospitals in Lima, Peru. Using a composite reference standard, we classified them as definite TBM, probable TBM, and non-TBM cases. We assessed the validity of four CSF parameters, in isolation and in different combinations, for diagnosing TBM: adenosine deaminase activity (ADA), protein level, glucose level, and lymphocytic pleocytosis. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients were included; 59 had a final diagnosis of TBM (18 confirmed and 41 probable). ADA was the best performing parameter. It attained a specificity of 95%, a positive likelihood ratio of 10.7, and an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 82.1%, but had a low sensitivity (55%). None of the combinations of CSF parameters achieved a fair performance for 'ruling out' TBM. CONCLUSIONS: Finding CSF ADA greater than 6 U/l in patients with a meningeal syndrome strongly supports a diagnosis of TBM and permits the commencement of anti-tuberculous treatment.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic validity of laboratory cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters for discriminating between tuberculous meningitis (TBM) and other causes of meningeal syndrome in high tuberculosis incidence settings. METHODS: From November 2009 to November 2011, we included patients with a clinical suspicion of meningitis attending two hospitals in Lima, Peru. Using a composite reference standard, we classified them as definite TBM, probable TBM, and non-TBM cases. We assessed the validity of four CSF parameters, in isolation and in different combinations, for diagnosing TBM: adenosine deaminase activity (ADA), protein level, glucose level, and lymphocytic pleocytosis. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients were included; 59 had a final diagnosis of TBM (18 confirmed and 41 probable). ADA was the best performing parameter. It attained a specificity of 95%, a positive likelihood ratio of 10.7, and an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 82.1%, but had a low sensitivity (55%). None of the combinations of CSF parameters achieved a fair performance for 'ruling out' TBM. CONCLUSIONS: Finding CSF ADA greater than 6 U/l in patients with a meningeal syndrome strongly supports a diagnosis of TBM and permits the commencement of anti-tuberculous treatment.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.06.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.06.003
M3 - A1: Web of Science-article
C2 - 23973430
SN - 1201-9712
VL - 17
SP - e1111-e1115
JO - International Journal of Infectious Diseases
JF - International Journal of Infectious Diseases
IS - 12
ER -